JRC NRD-505 HF Receiver (1977~79)
"Is it the great lost perfect set ? Probably not, but it sure is fun to use"..........Paul Bigelow
Click on photo above to visit Paul Lannuier's NRD-505 web page
(N9EWO Photo Edit)
The Japan Radio NRD-505
receiver was built between 1977 and 1979 and was not produced in
large numbers (about 1000). For those days the steep price tag of
almost $ 2300.00 was very hard for any consumer to afford. It's
matching NVA-505 speaker and 4 channel memory board (CD4-8) unit
were both options. No internal speaker. It used a PTO tuning
circuit, just as the Drake R-7/TR-7 sets of that day did . But
the PTO used in the 505 put the Drake's to shame (MUCH better
built) !!! And of course the drift factor in the Drakes were
nasty....505's had no such of a excessive problem.
The 4 channel memory option stored frequency only. A collectors set these's days as any used JRC NRD-545 overall will be a MUCH better deal (and performance) then any overpriced used NRD-505's. But for it's day it was a most intresting set. I have never had the chance to even see one of these in person, so input from Paul Bigelow below.
Keep in mind, with the NRD-505 being as old as it is now, problems with the set are very common, and the custom made parts needed to repair can no longer be purchased (well at least easy).
Top view of the JRC NRD-505 innards, you can eaisly see the PTO unit.
Click on photo above to visit Paul Lannuier's NRD-505 download page including schematics.
(N9EWO Photo Edit)
Information from Paul
Bigelow on his NRD-505. Thank You Paul.
Constructed like other JRC receivers. Robust, solid and with vertical cards that plug into a motherboard. Each card is separated by a shield. All aluminum construction for panels and chassis. Knobs are plastic. The VFO is (probably) permeability tuned much like the old Collins equipment.
Reception (compared with AOR AR7030):
Sensitivity - about equal, the JRC has slightly reduced sensitivity below 1600kc. The JRC may be a bit better on SW bands.
Selectivity - good, the AOR is a bit better but the narrow mechanical filter of the JRC works well. The narrow CW filter works very well. The filters can be adjusted so the JRC performance may be improved upon. All in all though, the AOR is better.
Sound - JRC, but not horrible. It is a bit hissy but the noise is NOT coming from the amplifier but the IF amp, I think. Since someone misadjusted the IF gain to maximum gain (not good) the noise can be reduced with proper IF gain adjustment. The AOR AR7030 wins (of course).
Overload - A bit of overload on Longwave from AM stations and on the 14MC band from STRONG 7MC stations. Again, proper adjustment of the mixers may help in this regard. Still, not bad. The AOR AR7030 is better.
Birdies - A few small ones but have not tried a REAL test yet. The JRC will probably win in this regard.
Tuning smoothness -- very smooth in places, 10 revolutions for each 1MC band. It uses nylon gears fitted with anti-backlash gears.
One big BEWARE concerning the construction of the NRD-505. The connections from the chassis to the front panel is not by ribbon cable (like the NRD-525) but rather by flexible ribbon film found today in camcorders and cameras. VERY high-tech for the day (1977) but with age it can get fragile and is difficult to repair. Mine has no problems but the slightest nick in the film or a wayward drop of solder could lead to a BIG headache.
The 4-channel memory seems to work well, if a bit crudely by today's standards. It only stores the frequency -- no mode information. It does have a provision for keeping the memory when the set is unplugged via a battery (on the circuit board, like the NRD-525).
The bandwidths are:(3 filter slots)
- 6kc - Ceramic filter AM-wide. Sounds pretty good -- not the highest sound quality but not too bad either.
- 2.2kc - Mechanical filter SSB and AM-narrow. Works well with SSB. AM is pretty muffled but intelligible.
- .6kc -(option) Mechanical filter CW. Works well with Morse code and provides a quiet background.
There is also an audio filter that switches in during CW mode and maybe SSB that restricts the audio highs and lows and reduces the hiss.
The mode selects the filter but there are positions for AM-Wide, AM-Narrow, USB, LSB, CW-Wide, CW-Narrow, RTTY.
Found the correct battery for the memory card. $8.50 -- ouch! Silver oxide camera battery.
Is it the "great lost perfect set"? Probably not, but it sure is fun to use.
Back To Main Page